AgentBrain in practice

How teams can use AgentBrain.

Prepare a response to a customer or examine the evidence behind a recommendation. These examples show what Employee and Analytics help with and which decisions remain with your team.

ContextSourcesProgressApproval

Start with the task

What do you need at the end?

With Employee, it might be a draft reply to a recurring enquiry. With Analytics, it is an analysis that helps you explain a recommendation and identify the evidence still missing.

Before starting, we agree which material AgentBrain may use and where your team needs to approve the work.

Digitale Unterstützung in der Schweizer Immobilienbewirtschaftung

Employee · Recurring tasks

Prepare customer enquiries for review.

A new enquiry arrives. Employee looks for the relevant details in the approved documents and drafts a reply. Your team checks it, adds missing details and decides what to send.

  • Define the task, knowledge and limits
  • Review selected cases
  • Take on further tasks only with your approval
Explore Employee →
AgentBrain Analytics verbindet Quellen und Entscheidungsfragen

AgentBrain Analytics

Examine the evidence before making a recommendation.

For a funding decision, you may need to check whether the reports provide enough evidence for a project. Analytics compares findings from the agreed sources. The summary includes disagreements and questions the material does not answer.

  • Review sources alongside findings
  • Distinguish supported, unclear and conflicting points
  • Identify what needs to be checked next
Explore Analytics →
Quellengebundene Evidenzkette von Information bis Freigabe

Analytics · Antimicrobial resistance example

What was announced, and what was carried out?

For projects tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR), plans are often in different documents from funding and implementation records. This example shows how Analytics connects those sources. Where evidence of impact is missing, the question stays open.

  • Plan → funding → implementation → outcome
  • Mentioning AMR does not demonstrate impact
  • Explicitly identify missing evidence

What connects both products

Your team can check the work and ask questions.

For both products, we agree on the information and permissions needed before use. These questions help your team review the work.

01What is used?

The documents you have approved.

02Which information applies?

Your team checks whether sources are current and relevant to the case.

03What is unresolved?

Missing details and conflicting evidence stay visible.

04What may happen?

Only the steps you have authorized.

05What can you look back at?

The result and its documented steps.

Start with a real case

Which task would you like to try?

Briefly describe the task or decision. We will reply with an assessment of whether AgentBrain fits and which material we would need for a test.

Discuss your project →Your enquiry does not commit you to a purchase.
A concrete use case?Discuss ↗